

I’ve had two friends tell me in recent weeks about how good it feels to send things out – letters and emails. One was my friend in Norway who writes me real letters that he posts with a multitude of pretty stamps. He’s said I don’t need to worry about responding. He loves getting up in the morning and putting pencil to paper and sharing what’s in his heart. Then a woman whom I share a lot with had her e-mails to me start bouncing back two and three days after sending them. She said it wasn’t response she needed so much as it was knowing that she was being heard. To send them out into the void, not knowing if I was going to get them, started to get to her.
I don’t have this blog set up in a way that tons of folks know about it and so I don’t get a lot of response, and that’s been fine by me. It’s the act of expressing myself that I enjoy and even require. But I admit that when you’re doing something like this and you take a break from it, and you have a hard time getting back to it, it’s because you start wondering why you do it. Why you take the time to do it is part of it. But there’s a bigger question (or two).
Why do I want to share what’s in my heart – even if not a soul is listening? Why do any of us?
And, When did we quit, and why would we question the value of it?
Those are bigger questions than why anyone starts a blog, but they’re related. When you get started on something like a blog, and you like it, and it takes on a life of its own – that’s just an amazing thing. I mean, maybe you start out to tell a story or write about one situation – the one you faced yesterday and that’s still on your mind today – and pretty soon, something else entirely other than what you started out with is happening. I’d say it’s like going into an antique shop – you never know what you’ll find.
So I was musing on this last night and this morning, being that it’s Sunday and there’s a book section in the newspaper, I went looking for it. I got hijacked by the article on the first page of Sunday Life. It’s about Avatars.
After reading the article, replete with “self-portrait avatar” renditions, I looked up the word avatar.
Avatar: decends from
ava – away +
tarati he crosses over.
1: the incarnation of a Hindu deity (as Vishnu) 2 a: an incarnation in human form b: an embodiment (as a concept or philosophy) often in a person 3: a variant phase or version of a continuing basic entity.
Fascinating.
The article highlights a number of avatar artists concluding with Dennis Calero, who does freelance comic-book art. “He decries today’s rampant “culture of celebrity” and thinks it healthy when “people wake up and say, ‘I don’t want to worship another person.’”
Instead, they want to express themselves, be made known as who they are, rather than as who people take them to be. Like anything else, this can be shallow or profound.
It’s kind of like the yearly self-portraits I mentioned a while back. One year, I was trying to do “literal” art. I first painted a sunrise. It was awful. As elementary as a kid’s would be but without the charm. I was so frustrated by it that I painted a second one. I was bolder and the feeling of “something happening” came in the midst of it. When it was done I liked it.
I decided to do the same thing with that year’s self-portraits. They’re the images at the top of this post. The first was literal. The second was what I painted when “something happened” as I worked on it. I got this feeling in my chest of a sort of excitement/dread/compulsion. I had no idea why I was adding the things I was adding, what the color choices were about, none of it. When it was done my daughter walked by my room and said it was a little scary. It is. But I like it. I see it as kind of cosmic and having some strength and power.
Then the whole process of painting the literal and the non let me see something new about life, and particularly about the process of creating. “Literally” I was standing in my room pacing around an easel or sitting at my desk drinking coffee and typing. That’s all you’d see. But what was happening, especially as I wrote the books of
A Course of Love, was not what you’d see. The “literal” had little relation to the non-literal experience.
So there's other possible descriptions of the avatar -- could be a stylized likeness of an Internet user, or could be a non-literal expression of an experience.
Quotes from "A Face in the Crowd,"
St. Paul Pioneer Press, 12-6-09, p. E1, by Julio Ojeda-Zapata.